 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
DESIGNER'S CORNER |
 |
 |
 |
|
Cost Impact of Switching From Bulk to SOI
By Jean-Luc Pelloie President & CTO, SOISIC www.soisic.com
Overall the cost of an SOI
chip is not higher than bulk
and may even be lower,
depending on the application.
|
|
 |
 |
Cost is an important factor when developing
a chip and going to production. Users
of bulk substrates may ask how they can
manage the added cost of the SOI
substrate if they were to switch their chip
from bulk to SOI CMOS.
As SOI brings higher speed and/or enables
a reduction in power consumption, one
can argue that these advantages bring an
added value and should allow for a higher
sales price of the chip. But for some, that
is not enough.
They argue that their applications are so
low-cost and their markets so cost driven
that their customers are not ready to pay
a premium for SOI. However, if they were
to look at the final cost of the chip or
even the cost of the system in which the
chip is going to be integrated rather than
just the price of the SOI substrate and
the cost of the process manufacturing,
chances are they would have very different
perspectives.
At the 90nm node, for a given speed
(frequency), we have demonstrated
that using SOI in the logic core with
standard cell libraries reduces total power
consumption by 41% and the die area
by 11% (see table). As the die area is
reduced, more chips fit on a wafer, and
yield increases commensurately.
SRAM size is also reduced in the periphery,
assuming that the bitcell area for bulk and
SOI is the same. New concepts such as
the floating-body embedded DRAM cell
using only one SOI transistor are promising
to significantly reduce the area of the
memory array and may be used in a part of
the memories of the chip.
Overall the cost of an SOI chip is not
higher and may even be lower than
bulk, depending on the application. SOI
creates extra savings at the system level.
With reduced power, heat generation is
reduced, in turn reducing system cost.
With SOI, the cell phone of the future can
sizzle with style but stay cool to the touch.

|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Opening the Route for Wireless SOI Systems-On-Chip
by Pierre Delatte CTO, CISSOID S.A. www.cissoid.com
Optimization of RF circuits for
high-resistivity SOI substrates
facilitates multi-mode,
multi-standard terminals
integration.
|
|
 |
 |
The new generations of multi-mode, multistandards
terminals increase the need to
integrate digital, analog and RF functions
on the same substrates using a System-on-
Chip (SoC) approach. Silicon-on-Insulator
(SOI), which can use high-resistivity (HR)
wafers ( > 1000 ohms.cm) for the mechanical,
supporting substrate (below the buried
oxide), is enabling breakthroughs in
designing RF circuits and integrating them
with low-power, low-voltage digital.
HR-SOI substrates offer a drastic
reduction in cross-talk (10dB at 1GHz),
allowing layout of digital and analog/RF
parts closer than in bulk, reducing chip
area. They boost the quality factor of onchip
inductors (+50%, see Figure 1) and
varactors (+40%) with a strong positive
impact on the consumption of RF circuits
(by 40% on a VCO design, as explained
below). They make it possible to integrate
RF switches with the performance of III-V
devices and with the low voltage operation
and programmability of CMOS. Having
high-Q RF switches on-chip will open new
routes in designing multi-mode, multistandard
wireless architectures.
|
 |
At CISSOID, a start-up company
specialized in analog and RF SOI design,
we are working on optimizing RF circuits
to take advantage of these high-resistivity
SOI substrates. Our methodology,
demonstrated on a low-power 5GHz
Voltage-Controlled-Oscillator (VCO),
was presented at the last ESSCIRC
Conference. Figure 1 shows the intrinsic
gain between a spiral inductor on a
Patterned Ground Shield (PGS), giving
the best quality factor on bulk (curve a),
and the same inductor on high-resistivity
SOI substrates (curve b). At CISSOID, we
further optimized the inductor on HR-SOI
to obtain the best quality factor, obtaining
a gain of 50% (curve c).
Based on these results, we designed
and optimized a 5GHz VCO. Figure 2
compares the phase noise versus the
bias current for the VCOs optimized
respectively on PGS and high-resistivity
SOI substrates. For a given specification,
the power consumption of the VCO on SOI
is reduced by 40%.
This shows how the advantages of highresistivity
SOI substrates combined with
expert circuit design is pushing the limits
for wireless systems-on-chip.
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|